Sometimes a single misapprehension or sticky question stands in the way of an honest believer’s examination of the doctrines of grace. John Samson answers those questions with a pastoral heart, yet with biblical fidelity. –Dr. James White, Alpha & Omega Ministries, on John Samson’s new book, Twelve What Abouts
There is no greater joy than what comes through a deeper understanding of God’s grace and His particular love for His people demonstrated by the atoning work of the Lord Jesus Christ. Neither is there a more humbling doctrine of Scripture than God’s sovereign election in the salvation of men. Yet, the more we grow in our understanding of grace, the more reason we have to rejoice that God would save us, not according to our will or anything good we have done (including exercising the faith to believe), but according to His glorious will and purpose all to the praise of His glorious grace!
Many Christians struggle with the doctrine of election, which is helpfully summed up in what is commonly called “Calvinism“. You might be familiar with the acronym “TULIP”, which to Calvinists is a cheerfully embraced biblical abstract of how the Gospel works. Charles Spurgeon, fondly known as the “Prince of Preachers”, went so far as to say,
[T]here is no such thing as preaching Christ and Him crucified, unless we preach what nowadays is called Calvinism. It is a nickname to call it Calvinism; Calvinism is the gospel, and nothing else. I do not believe we can preach the gospel, if we do not preach justification by faith, without works; nor unless we preach the sovereignty of God in His dispensation of grace; nor unless we exalt the electing, unchangeable, eternal, immutable, conquering love of Jehovah; nor do I think we can preach the gospel, unless we base it upon the special and particular redemption of His elect and chosen people which Christ wrought out upon the cross; nor can I comprehend a gospel which lets saints fall away after they are called, and suffers the children of God to be burned in the fires of damnation (source).
Yet, many Christians struggle with the idea that God would save some and not others – that God would choose some and not others. But as I’ve heard before, the amazing thing is not that God saves some and not others, the amazing thing is that God saves any at all! Even still, what Calvinists esteem as the “doctrines of grace” are difficult to reconcile for some believers, and even repudiated and scorned by many more (especially in today’s man-centered church culture).
Perhaps you are such a believer who is struggling through these doctrines but desires to grow in the knowledge of God’s grace. Maybe you have difficulty with the “problem verses” in Scripture that seem to speak against God’s absolute sovereign election. Or, you might be one who admittedly hates Calvinism, but you are curious as to how Calvinists deal with these “problem verses”. Even still, perhaps you already embrace Calvinism and are looking to refine your understanding of God’s sovereign grace. Well, I have just the book for you!
In January, I had the opportunity to proofread my good friend John Samson’s new release titled, Twelve What Abouts: Answering Common Objections Concerning God’s Sovereignty in Election. I’ve had the pleasure of knowing John since 2010 when he began his blog Effectual Grace (some of you may know John from Reformation Theology). He has a shepherd’s heart and a way of explaining things in very simple terms. In fact, Twelve What Abouts was written for the purpose of reaching the lay person, or average “Joe Christian”, to help them deeper understand God’s amazing grace.
As I read the book, I was often reminded of the extremely helpful articles written by John in the last couple of years that God used to give me greater understanding of these doctrines. For instance, in his post Three Views on Man’s Condition, John explains how Jesus raising Lazarus from the dead is a depiction of God’s work of regeneration in the heart of the elect:
Lazarus, being a lifeless corpse in the tomb, did not cooperate with Christ with regard to his own resurrection. Jesus simply cried out “Lazarus come forth!” and this call was powerful and sufficient in and of itself to bring dead Lazarus back to life. Christ did not interview the dead man Lazarus and ask if he would like to be resurrected, and once he got the “all clear” went ahead with his plan, now having obtained Lazarus’ permission and assent. Nor did Lazarus, once brought back to life, immediately take Jesus to court in attempt to sue him for violating his free will – his libertarian rights as a dead man to stay dead! No, for the rest of his earthly life, Lazarus was deeply grateful for the unspeakable mercy he had received from the Master.
This is a beautiful picture of what God does in our regeneration from spiritual death. Man, once receiving this grace of regeneration, then infallibly responds in faith to the effectual call of God.
John has also tackled what he calls “those pesky Arminian verses” in various articles – verses such as John 3:16, 1 Timothy 2:4, and 2 Peter 3:9. John writes in his article, Understanding 1 Timothy 2:4:
Now, if “all men” refers to every individual on earth, then firstly, Christ often fails in his work as the mediator – for the Scripture makes it plain that God’s wrath will indeed be poured out on many in hell. Secondly, we are left with a ransom that in the case of those who end up in hell, does not actually pay for sin – they are in hell paying for their sin. If Christ actually paid for the sins of those who end up in hell, what did Christ’s sacrifice actually achieve for them? The answer is nothing at all. We would be left with an atonement that does not actually atone – a mere hypothetical redemption that achieves nothing in all actuality, for the lost sinner. We would be left with Christ as a failing Mediator who provides a redemption that does not actually redeem. I hesitate to even write those words, such is the scandal of them, but this is what we are left with if “all men” means everyone.
These are just a couple of examples of what you can expect from reading Twelve What Abouts. If you are familiar with the work of Jim McClarty or James White, then you will love John’s book. It is easy to understand and sometimes humorous, but very rich in truth as properly and faithfully explained from the texts.
John deals with the following 12 “what abouts”:
- What About the Love of God?
- What About Free Will?
- What About God’s Foreknowledge?
- What About John 3:16?
- What About 2 Peter 3:9?
- What About 1 Timothy 2:4?
- What About Matthew 23:37?
- What About 1 Timothy 4:10?
- What About John 12:32?
- What About Reprobation?
- What About Lost Loved Ones?
- What About Prayer and Evangelism?
At 160 pages and very short chapters, Twelve What Abouts is a quick read and very helpful as a reference book. Especially if you have struggled in understanding God’s electing grace, this just might be the book that God uses to illuminate Scripture like you’ve never seen it before. I hope you get a copy of Twelve What Abouts, that the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ would become even more special to you!
You can read the book’s foreword by John Hendryx, creator and editor of Monergism.com, here: From the Foreword…
The ebook version can picked up for $4 at Monergism Books
Paperback edition available for $9.25 at Solid Ground Christian Books
Mitch
March 2, 2012
I will have to look into that Brother that is one thing I have at times struggled to understand the Sovereignty of God fully. You know some things Brother like this in this life we won’t understand until we are in Heaven. For example, the trinity.
Justin Edwards
March 5, 2012
Good deal, brother. Indeed, some things will remain a mystery to us this side of heaven.
Mike Weaks
March 2, 2012
It’s a funny thing how things finally work out over a lifetime. I am nearly 58 years old and following Jesus best I know how since I was 18 years old. I have rejected Baptist theology most of those 40 years due to what my Baptist friends tell me is their theology. I cannot nor will not “nail down” every Calvinist doctrine in the list as essential to know and follow my Lord Jesus Christ. As much as I admire John MacArthur and his sound teaching, I will not draw a line in the sand regarding election and eschatology as Calvin and MacArthur do. (I think I’m going to be hung, drawn, and quartered for my departure from Hyper-Calvinism.) Until I heard Paul Washer give some “wiggle room” for differences amongst Baptists, I rejected joining any Baptist Church. I worked ten years in Mexico along side two different Baptist missionaries and one national pastor and we accepted each other in spite of our differences. But when I heard Paul Washer admitting another way of understanding eternal security of the “believer,” I was pleasantly stunned. I asked my wife to listen to this video and exclaimed that maybe I’m a Baptist after all. I may not be a “pure” one in the Calvinist way, but I am now attending and taking membership classes in a Baptist Church. My pastor knows what I believe…and he’s ok with it. At least I think it’s funny…
Justin Edwards
March 5, 2012
Hi Mike, thanks for the comment and I’m glad to see you are growing. While I grew up going to many different denominations (Southern Baptist, Presbyterian, Methodist), I’m just now beginning to understand the history of these denominations and where I might fit historically speaking. Like Mike Ratliff, at this point in my life I believe I fall into “Reformed Baptist” as I embrace the Solas and the doctrines of grace as well as believer’s baptism. I am currently studying the 1644 and 1689 London Baptist Confessions of Faith. You might find them helpful as well:
1644: http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/bc1644.htm
1689: http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/bcof.htm
For what it’s worth, Charles Spurgeon was a reformed baptist.
I do have a question about your mention of Paul Washer. What do you mean by him alluding to “wiggle room” for eternal security? And what is your understanding of eternal security?
Mike Weaks
March 5, 2012
Hi Justin, here’s to hoping we don’t get our “Mikes” confused. I hope my “line in the sand” comment was not confrontational as I appreciate this blog and follow it religiously. If I can find the YouTube link for Paul Washer I will forward it. He said something along the lines of(to my recollection), ” I’m sure this is being recorded, I’ll have trouble for what I’m about to say, and I’ll probably not be invited back.” PW-“If I now turn my back on this ministry and God at this point in my life, maybe I was never a Christian in the 1st place…” That statement was stunning to me.
Please be assured that I am certainly not an enemy to Calvinism or Baptist Reformed theology. I am a close friend that did not ever understand that I was free to disagree with all points of Reformed Theology.
I certainly do not want to take away anything from God’s sovereignty in regards to election or otherwise, but at the same time when my Baptists friends bring it up so often it almost appears to be a point of contention unnecessarily. I admit, maybe that’s just me.
As far as eternal security of the believer we are probably in total agreement. But the evidence of what I observe of some “converts” shows me the salvation was pseudo salvation with no evidence of the new life in Christ and a well meaning Christian workers promising them eternal security no matter the evidence to the contrary. As Tozer said, “an imaginary Christ, an imaginary salvation.”
Please remember I’ve had a lot of misconceptions about Baptist theology over the decades and I have a lot to learn. Maybe I’ll come around, but I’m very pleased to fellowship with a Baptist church and that it’s ok to disagree with some points.
Justin, I probably made some broad points, but I bet I am very close to 100% Reformed. I just won’t say something like (not saying you are), “the only respectable Baptists are those that hold to pre-trib eschatology.”
I pray my thoughts are in no way taken in anything but brotherly kindness. I really appreciate your blog.
In Christ,
Mike
Mike Weaks
March 5, 2012
Justin, I found the link. Took me awhile. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oul-9fbp1Ak
Fast forward to the end @2hours. I’m not sure this is the one and same, but he says basically the same providing my “wiggle room.” I don’t believe Paul Washer believes differently regarding the eternal security of believers, but does take great issue with faulty evangelism. The link should be “10 Indictments Against the Modern Church in America ” I was spell bound by this message. Great stuff!
In Christ,
Mike
Mike Ratliff
March 3, 2012
Mike Weaks, some of the strongest and most fervent Calvinists and Gospel oriented Christians I know are also Baptists… I am both as well as is my good friend and brother in the Lord Jon Cardwell: http://www.facebook.com/Christ.Crucified
Justin Edwards
March 5, 2012
I did not know that about you, not that I could not have probably figured it out with a little thought lol…would you consider yourself to be Covenantal, Mike?
Mike Weaks
March 5, 2012
I had to look up Covenantal…I’ll be honest. I thought you were making that up.Cc;
Mike Weaks
March 5, 2012
typo…
Mike Weaks
March 4, 2012
Mike Ratliff, thanks for the facebook link. Got the book. Although I do not consider myself a Calvinist or a Baptist, I find myself in agreement with most of their theology. I’m pretty sure Calvin, Arminius,and Luther ever intended their names to ever be used in the fashion to describe our theology. We do, but I don’t. I really dislike the divisiveness and argument it brings up by drawing the “line in the sand.” To divide ourselves for differences on election and end times seems unnecessary. I would never include the two in a gospel message or relating to the terms of following Jesus. I certainly will not divorce myself from Spurgeon because I disagree with a few points. That said, I find myself content attending a Baptist church after all these years. I still think it’s funny…
Justin Edwards
March 5, 2012
What do you mean by drawing a line in the sand? Just trying to understand you more clearly.
pam
March 5, 2012
@ Mike Weaks: Election and predestination point to one thing and that is GRACE! Listen to some of the talks and the verse by verse teaching over at Jim McCLarty’s website, salvationbygrace.org. If you think that man has some part in his salvation, then what provisions did God make for the Gentiles in the O.T.?
God has always been particular and if you read the book mentioned above you will see that. Christ died for particular people that were written in the Lambs Book of Life written from before the foundation of the world. That means before your feet hit the planet, it was a done deal.
Grace, grace, grace!!! It’s a beautiful thing.
pam
Justin Edwards
March 5, 2012
Amen, Pam – great recommendation to Jim!
Mike Weaks
March 5, 2012
I 2nd the amen to Pam. I would never say that man has something to offer. My understanding (and I am willing to learn although I understand many young people do not believe “old dogs” can) of election is not 100% Calvinist. I also understand God works through the “foolishness of preaching” and is still all of grace and not of any effort of man. I also understand that the scripture point out in 1 Tim 2 ,”For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth. For there is one God and one Mediator between God and men, the Man Christ Jesus, who gave Himself a ransom for all,…” I agree most of what ya’ll do, just not 100%.
It is ok to have a difference an love one another?
Mike
pam
March 7, 2012
Hey M.W., The one thing that I learned that really helped me from the beginning is that to understand what the Bible is saying you have to keep things in context and see who each book was written to. The Tim.passage that you mentioned is best understood when you know the meaning of the word “all”.Up to that point, only the Jews had been the chosen people. Jesus even said, ” I have only come for the lost sheep of the house of Israel”. So what Paul is saying is that God desires all kinds or types of people to be saved now. Not just Jews. If it were all people then Christ was ineffective because all don’t believe. Same thing in 2Peter3:9, he is talking to believers. The Lord is patient, not willing that any of the elect would perish, and they won’t.
Keeping Israel and the Body of Christ separate is the key to understanding the Scriptures. We are all saved by grace thru faith and all Scripture is for us but all of it was not directly written to us.
Jim McClarty has some excellent Q&A on his website which explains a lot of this.
I humbly submit my reply hoping that it would not offend a fellow Southerner(ya”ll gave it away).
pam
Mike Weaks
March 12, 2012
Hi Pam,
No offense for the Southerner comment at all. I’m Northern born and raised by parents from the South who lost the accent a long time ago. I just like the friendly tone of “ya’ll.”
Calvinism is a large study for me and I can only say that too many scriptures point in different directions that I cannot nail it down. You honestly choose to believe one way and I another.
I hold to much of Calvinism, but I would not describe myself in the term. I think the Scriptures do not point me into taking sides. I am firm on the essentials, the Solas,etc. I am mostly “Reformed.”
In Christ,
Mike